Predictors of Outcomes in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background—Patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis have a poor prognosis with conservative therapy but a high operative mortality if treated surgically. Recently, we proposed a new index of aortic stenosis severity derived from dobutamine stress echocardiography, the projected aortic valve area at a normal transvalvular flow rate, as superior to other conventional indices to differentiate true-severe from pseudosevere aortic stenosis. The objective of this study was to identify the determinants of survival, functional status, and change in left ventricular ejection fraction during follow-up of patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis. Methods and Results—One hundred one patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 1.2 cm, left ventricular ejection fraction 40%, and mean gradient 40 mm Hg) underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography and an assessment of functional capacity using the Duke Activity Status Index. A subset of 72 patients also underwent a 6-minute walk test. Overall survival was 70 5% at 1 year and 57 6% at 3 years. After adjusting for age, gender, and the type of treatment (aortic valve replacement versus no aortic valve replacement), significant predictors of mortality during follow-up were a Duke Activity Status Index 20 (P 0.0005) or 6-minute walk test distance 320 m (P 0.0001, in the subset of 72 patients), projected aortic valve area at a normal transvalvular flow rate 1.2 cm (P 0.03), and peak dobutamine stress echocardiography left ventricular ejection fraction 35% (P 0.03). More severe stenosis, defined as projected aortic valve area 1.2 cm, was a predictor of mortality only in the no aortic valve replacement group. The Duke Activity Status Index, 6-minute walk test, and left ventricular ejection fraction improved significantly during follow-up in the aortic valve replacement group, but remained unchanged or decreased in the no aortic valve replacement group. Conclusion—In patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis, the most significant risk factors for poor outcome were (1) impaired functional capacity as measured by Duke Activity Status Index or 6-minute walk test distance; (2) more severe valve stenosis as measured by projected aortic valve area at a normal transvalvular flow rate; and (3) reduced peak stress left ventricular ejection fraction, a composite measure accounting for both resting left ventricular function and contractile reserve. (Circulation. 2008;118[suppl 1]:S234–S242.)
منابع مشابه
Clinical presentation and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with low flow/low gradient severe aortic stenosis.
OBJECTIVES To identify predictors of mortality, functional status, and hemodynamical changes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for low flow/low gradient aortic stenosis (LF/LG AS). BACKGROUND There is little published data regarding the outcomes of patients with LF/LG AS following TAVI. METHODS Sixty-eight patients with severe AS, left ventricular dysfunc...
متن کاملPredictors of outcomes in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results of the multicenter TOPAS Study.
BACKGROUND Patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis have a poor prognosis with conservative therapy but a high operative mortality if treated surgically. Recently, we proposed a new index of aortic stenosis severity derived from dobutamine stress echocardiography, the projected aortic valve area at a normal transvalvular flow rate, as superior to other conventional indices to differ...
متن کاملPredictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low-flow severe aortic stenosis: a Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial analysis.
BACKGROUND The prognosis and treatment of patients with low-flow (LF) severe aortic stenosis are controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial randomized patients with severe aortic stenosis to medical management versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR; inoperable cohort) and surgical aortic valve replacement versus TAVR (high-risk...
متن کاملManagement of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: need for an integrated approach, including assessment of symptoms, hypertension, and stenosis severity.
SEE PAGE 55 I n 2007, we reported that a substantial proportion of patients with severe aortic stenosis may have a low flow (LF) (i.e., reduced stroke volume), and thus, often have a low transvalvular pressure gradient (LG), despite a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (1). The 2014 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines (2) classified ...
متن کاملBicuspid aortic valve stenosis with successful transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) using the Sapien 3 valve.
catheterization study. Circulation 2013;128:S235–S242. 18. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P. Letter by Dumesnil and Pibarot regarding article, ‘Outcome of patients with low-gradient ‘severe’ aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction’. Circulation 2011;124:e360. 19. Cueff C, Serfaty JM, Cimadevilla C, Laissy JP, Himbert D, Tubach F, Duval X, Iung B, Enriquez-Sarano M, Vahanian A, Messika-Zeitoun D. ...
متن کامل